Human Operating System (2)

5 Jul

Especially for those of us with a rather active imagination, we may not be capable of achieving all that we dream of (at least not at our present level of evolution). To continue to hope for and pine after something which is currently impossible leads to frustration. The key is Acceptance.

What is the relationship between desire and acceptance? Is there a borderline at a certain level beyond which desires are fruitless and mere fantasy? If so, how can we know our own, personal boundary? One would not want to stop short of one’s full potential nor exist solely in a fantasy world.

Maybe the best course is to act on our life plan progressively a little at a time and continuously evolve it by updating our interests, desires, goals and activity as we experience life and gain knowledge. To do otherwise is to either live a fantasy life or to continue pushing the same impulse satisfaction buttons each day (those learned in the past which made us feel ‘OK’). This would be akin to stagnation or merely ‘going through the motions of life’.

To summarize my suggestion of the best approach in life to Desire, Potentiality and Acceptance: Identify present desires and continually strive for and evolve them while accepting life as it currently is.


Human Operating System

14 Jun

The average person relies upon collective convention to get along in life. This is sort of a templet of preconceived ideas, responses and viewpoints. It is useful because if adopted one no longer needs to “think” through each life situation that occurs. This saves time and energy but it also hems one into a collection of beliefs and automatic responses which become outdated. Witness the “generation gap” of the nineteen sixties and seventies. Adults in their forties and fifties simply didn’t understand the thinking of the youth and visa versa. Another risk of adopting a rigid, automatic operating system of beliefs and reactions is that it may be based upon inferior reasoning done by previous persons who happened to be respected in their time. (Think about a society which evolves over time based upon a strong and structured belief in a supernatural entity which runs things behind the scenes.)


31 May

We live, we do some work, we form some relationships, we die. Yet during our lifetimes there are millions of people who lack the things that we the fortunate ones, enjoy.

Some people live in horrific conditions of poverty. Children who live in some groups have their genitals mutilated or surgically modified against their consent. In one country a group numbering one half the population is forbidden to even drive a car. In another country an offense against the regime in power lands not just the offender but three generations of her family in a forced labor prison.

The examples above are just a tiny number of the injustices that go on in this world that we all call our home. They are people-against-people offenses. They are not caused by some natural catastrophe or environmental reality. They are caused by people. They are caused by us. They are reversible and they are preventable.

When I ponder these things my next thought is, “How could I not attempt to change the world just a little bit for my having taken a place in it?”. Maybe I am seeking a purpose beyond that of my small, insignificant, biological life. I don’t think my aspirations are grandiose. I am not living under some delusion that our human world is going to magically change overnight simply because I write something. Our societal evolution is however a process. If I can simply propagate some small shift in the evolution of our society towards that of a more just and fair one, that is certainly better than having done nothing but lived and died.

Because I have no large sphere of influence I can only do several things at this point. I can endeavor to show to the few people I am in contact with, an example through my own life of the principals I espouse. Secondly, I can write my ideas down and hope that enough people, including those in positions of power and influence discover them and decide to help make a difference.

If any positive change comes at all due to what I have written and how I have lived my life I will consider it a success.

– Ivor Peter Brians

The Evolution of Our Civilization

26 Feb

Challenge: To advance our civilization while providing a fair, just society for all members.

Our system of civilization is one based upon competition. In all of our striving to provide for our needs we compete with others. This is true whether we are seeking a mate or providing for shelter. This system of a competitive society stems from our evolutionary history. It seems to make sense or at least be convenient to have set society up in this manner since we are predisposed to compete.

In the human world we have taken nature’s system of free competition and modified it with law to suit an empathic, thinking species. The problem is that because we evolved through competition this urge is primary. We follow society’s laws only secondarily. As long as we perceive ourselves as successful we follow most of the laws. However as soon as an individual perceives himself as having been wronged or for some reason living below his vision of his standard he has a tendency to start ignoring the laws in order to rise himself up. In doing so he or she starts to negatively impact others and this of course is where the problems arise.

Basing the structure of our society on this natural competition model lends itself to abuses. In the natural world there is no moral rule set an organism is obliged to follow. Thus organisms will kill, parasitize, enslave and steal from their fellows. The only limits in place are those built into the natural system itself which prevent any one species or individual over running all others.

Making laws to contain our impulses is not anywhere close to 100% effective. Religion does not work either and seems to create its own set of problems when people follow blindly. Our biology seems to hold the trump card. We are motivated very strongly to do what our nature urges us to and one of these urges is to compete for our place in a hierarchical society. This likely springs from an evolutionary “pack” mentality.

I wonder if there might be a more advanced way however. We are no longer a species which is barely surviving like we were in our early history. We no longer have to fear being eaten by other species or have to spend the bulk of our efforts in search of food. We now dominate the globe and can alter the landscape as we wish(not always for the best I’m afraid). We produce food in such abundance and so cheaply that too much high calorie food and too little physical activity provides the major health risk to our population. There are starving people in this world but it is not because of a lack of ability to produce the food.

Competition throughout mankind’s history has many positive aspects and has driven our advancement. Throughout our evolutionary history, struggle and competition has made us not only stronger but has actually made us into the species that we are. We however no longer need to compete in order to pass superior genes along to future generations. We are now a technological race rather than one which is still evolving biologically. Unless we wish to go back to a “survival of the fittest” mode we are married to technology to keep our bodies and humanity as a whole healthy.

So the question is, how do we move forward in the most fair and just manner? A possibility might be to somehow give equal access to resources and education yet maintain some sort of effort/reward system for everything else which would allow us to gratify our urge to compete. Governments have tried communism and failed and I don’t think the answer lies in attempting to actually equalize the standard of living for all.

A society in which members compete for quality of life and are rewarded by how well they do against each other is possibly just an evolutionary step in our civilization’s history. If we wish to push humanity beyond our earthbound roots we must find alternative ways.

This essay has raised more questions than any it might have answered. There are many very intelligent, well educated people in our society. Hopefully some of you will comment on this thus contributing to our civilization’s evolution to a more just, efficient system.